[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":109},["ShallowReactive",2],{"beta-site":3,"beta-categories":21,"site":77,"article-1132":83},{"site_key":4,"domain":5,"site_name":6,"theme":4,"language":7,"logo":8,"favicon":8,"default_og_image":9,"navigation":10,"seo":11,"analytics":16,"verification":17,"features":18},"news_beta","yuejiezixun.com","阅界","zh-CN","",null,[],{"home_title":12,"title_suffix":13,"default_robots":14,"home_description":15},"阅界｜综合资讯"," - 阅界","index,follow","阅界提供时事、娱乐、财经等综合资讯。",[],[],{"rss_enabled":19,"search_enabled":20,"sitemap_enabled":19},true,false,[22,28,33,38,43,48,53,58,63,68,72],{"id":23,"code":24,"name":25,"slug":24,"level":23,"parent_id":26,"sort":27},1,"breaking","即时",0,10,{"id":29,"code":30,"name":31,"slug":30,"level":23,"parent_id":26,"sort":32},2,"china","中国",20,{"id":34,"code":35,"name":36,"slug":35,"level":23,"parent_id":26,"sort":37},3,"world","国际",30,{"id":39,"code":40,"name":41,"slug":40,"level":23,"parent_id":26,"sort":42},4,"hongkong","港闻",40,{"id":44,"code":45,"name":46,"slug":45,"level":23,"parent_id":26,"sort":47},5,"entertainment","娱乐",50,{"id":49,"code":50,"name":51,"slug":50,"level":23,"parent_id":26,"sort":52},6,"finance","财经",60,{"id":54,"code":55,"name":56,"slug":55,"level":23,"parent_id":26,"sort":57},7,"sports","体育",70,{"id":59,"code":60,"name":61,"slug":60,"level":23,"parent_id":26,"sort":62},8,"lifestyle","生活",80,{"id":64,"code":65,"name":66,"slug":65,"level":23,"parent_id":26,"sort":67},9,"tech","科技",90,{"id":27,"code":69,"name":70,"slug":69,"level":23,"parent_id":26,"sort":71},"hot","热话",100,{"id":73,"code":74,"name":75,"slug":74,"level":23,"parent_id":26,"sort":76},11,"opinion","观点",110,{"site_key":4,"domain":5,"site_name":6,"theme":4,"language":7,"logo":8,"favicon":8,"default_og_image":9,"navigation":78,"seo":79,"analytics":80,"verification":81,"features":82},[],{"home_title":12,"title_suffix":13,"default_robots":14,"home_description":15},[],[],{"rss_enabled":19,"search_enabled":20,"sitemap_enabled":19},{"id":84,"site_key":4,"content_kind":85,"slug":86,"path":87,"title":88,"excerpt":89,"content_html":90,"featured_image":91,"images":92,"category":97,"tags":98,"topic":9,"related_articles":104,"seo":105,"published_at":108,"updated_at":108},1132,"news","shanghai-18-year-rental-dispute-court-ruling","\u002Farticle\u002Fshanghai-18-year-rental-dispute-court-ruling-1132\u002F","上海租客18年租期结束遭索赔25万｜法院判决还原纠纷始末","上海长宁区法院审结一起长达18年的租赁纠纷案，租客退租时被房东索赔25万元要求「恢复如新」，最终法院判决租客赔偿3万余元修复费用及空置损失，房东退还部分押金。","\u003Cp>上海市长宁区人民法院近日审结一起特殊的房屋租赁合同纠纷案。案件涉及租客连续租住同一物业长达18年后退租，因房屋恢复原状问题与房东产生争议，索赔金额高达25万元人民币。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>18年租约引发的修复争议\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>根据法院披露的案情，2006年，张先生与房东刘女士签订为期1年的租赁合同，约定退租时需将房屋恢复至交房原状，并支付了11600元押金。租约到期后，双方未续签书面合同，但张先生持续租住至2024年。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cfigure class=\"stheadline-lead-image\">\u003Cimg alt=\"上海长宁区法院审理的18年租赁纠纷案现场照片\" src=\"https:\u002F\u002Foss.articledatacenter.com\u002Fadc\u002Fmedia\u002F5e\u002Fadcimg_01kxmzfv7hn5s1tvwncjrhp5np.jpg\">\u003Cfigcaption>涉及18年租赁纠纷的上海某住宅小区（图源：小红书）\u003C\u002Ffigcaption>\u003C\u002Ffigure>\u003Ch2>装修变更成争议焦点\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>在长期租赁期间，张先生曾获得房东口头同意，\u003Cstrong>将房屋白色墙面改为黄色\u003C\u002Fstrong>，并将原三房格局改造为四房。退租时，刘女士要求租客将房屋恢复至「全新状态」，并提出包括墙体、地板、灶台等在内的多项修复要求，总金额约25万元。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cblockquote>法院特别指出：「房屋出租时已装修多年，且租客实际使用达18年，正常使用产生的损耗不可避免。」\u003C\u002Fblockquote>\u003Ch2>法院判决平衡双方权益\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>经审理，长宁区法院认为房东未能证明房屋损坏系租客不当使用所致。综合考虑房屋现状、使用年限及双方过错等因素，最终作出以下判决：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>张先生支付房屋修复费用3万余元\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>赔偿房屋空置损失3万余元（参照市场租金标准）\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>刘女士返还保证金6600元\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Cp>本案判决现已生效，为长期租赁关系中的装修复原问题提供了重要司法判例。法官提醒，租赁双方应通过书面形式明确约定装修条款，避免日后纠纷。\u003C\u002Fp>","https:\u002F\u002Foss.articledatacenter.com\u002Fadc\u002Fmedia\u002F5e\u002Fadcimg_01kxmzfv7hn5s1tvwncjrhp5np.jpg",[93],{"file":94,"path":95,"source_url":96},"001.jpg","D:\\ruanjiananzhuang\\laragon\\www\\article-data-center\\storage\\app\u002Fcrawler\u002Farticles\\stheadline\\74\\740938816493c8212f96946b77d977a1\\images\\001.jpg","https:\u002F\u002Fimage.hkhl.hk\u002Ff\u002F1024p0\u002F0x0\u002F100\u002Fnone\u002F4148fc37d6061a88ff64664389409e60\u002F2026-07\u002FNew_Project_fgfgfggbfgfb.jpg",{"id":29,"code":30,"name":31,"slug":30,"canonical_code":30},[99,100,101,102,103],"房屋租赁","法律案例","上海法院","民事纠纷","装修争议",[],{"title":106,"description":107,"robots":14,"canonical_path":87},"上海18年租赁纠纷案判决｜租客赔偿标准与法律解读","上海法院审理18年长期租赁纠纷案，详解房东25万索赔被驳回原因，解析租赁合同装修条款注意事项与司法判例价值。","2026-07-16T16:30:07+08:00",1784218278538]